Ilyas Milad Fahim vs Matthew Forbes Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jul at 06:53 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Milad Fahim vs M. Forbes

MAR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fahim 1 - 0 Forbes
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilyas Milad Fahim winning 2 and Matthew Forbes winning 0. The last match between Ilyas Milad Fahim and Matthew Forbes was at the M15 Rochester, 15-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Ilyas Milad Fahim getting the victory 6-2 7-6(8).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fahim | 1 |
| Forbes | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Rochester(07-15-25)
I. M. Fahim vs M. Forbes H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 42.86% (12-16) | Career Total W/L | 51.85% (14-13) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. M. Fahim vs M. Forbes Match Preview:
- In the past six months, Forbes has a slight advantage in second serve performance, winning 50.79% of points compared to Fahim's 47.62%. Could this be crucial in their matchup?
- When it comes to return games, Fahim outperforms Forbes, winning 44.83% of points on opponents' second serves versus Forbes' 40.43%.
- Considering first serve return, Fahim again shows strength with a 30.99% success rate compared to Forbes' 23.68%.
- Under pressure, Fahim has saved 56.25% of breakpoints recently, slightly better than Forbes' 53.33% save rate.
- Overall, Fahim is more successful with a yearly win rate of 41.67% compared to Forbes' 14.29%.
- Both players prefer clay, with Fahim holding a 44% win rate and Forbes close behind at 43%.
- Fahim has faced tougher opponents, with their average rank at 221.75, while Forbes' opponents were ranked 199.71 on average.
- In deciding sets, Fahim excels, winning 67% over the last year, whereas Forbes has yet to win a deciding set.
- Conversion of break points slightly favors Forbes with 33.33% against Fahim's 30.43%.
Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head comparison reveals insightful patterns between Fahim and Forbes. While Forbes holds a marginal edge in second serve performance, Fahim demonstrates superior abilities in return games and under pressure.
Fahim’s ability to return successfully, especially on first serves, might prove advantageous. The slight lead in breakpoint saves shows Fahim's resilience during critical moments.
Overall match success heavily favors Fahim, with a significantly higher win percentage over the past year. Their proficiency in deciding sets also suggests mental toughness and strategic edge when matches reach crucial stages.
Both players have similar success on clay, indicating balanced conditions in this surface matchup. However, Fahim’s experience against tougher competition could be pivotal.
Based on the current statistics and trends, Fahim appears to be the likely winner of the upcoming encounter, especially if they leverage their return game strengths effectively.
Ilyas Milad Fahim vs Matthew Forbes Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. M. Fahim vs M. Forbes H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:13:9 | Average Match Time | 2:13:9 |
| 68% (46/68) | 1st Serve % | 66% (56/85) |
| 70% (32/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (32/56) |
| 55% (12/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) |
| 48% (41/85) | Return Points Win % | 35% (24/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. M. Fahim Recent Matches Played
M. Forbes Recent Matches Played

I. M. Fahim vs M. Forbes Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42.86% (12/16) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.85% (14/13) |
| 42.86% (27/36) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.54% (29/32) |
| 47.99% (310/336) | Games Win/Loss | 51.25% (287/273) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.54% (8/5) |
| 44.44% (8/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 31 | Aces Total | 107 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 48 | Total Double Faults | 96 |
| 1:13:56 | Average Match Time | 1:23:25 |
| 245.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 427.41 |
| 63% (812/1293) | 1st Serve % | 58% (816/1414) |
| 57% (459/812) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (569/816) |
| 49% (236/481) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (270/598) |
| 39% (58/149) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (51/128) |
| 42% (521/1247) | Return Points Win % | 38% (509/1336) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 42.86% (12/16) | Futures W/L | 56.00% (14/11) |
| 43% (12/28) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (14/26) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (5/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 57% (4/7) | Deciding Set Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 82% (11/9) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (12/11) |
| 18% (11/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (12/1) |
| 18% (17/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (15/3) |